Digital competition in initial teacher training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35362/rie682189Keywords:
: Internet | digital competence | teamwork | social software.Abstract
The current investigation was carried out in 2013 with students of Education from the Town of Guayana (Venezuela). One of the primary aims of this research is to describe how these students use different technological tools; we are interested in the differences and similarities between the use of digital resources according to the context (university, workplace, personal life, etc.). The other goal of this project is to examine how the students’ predisposition towards team work is influenced by the use of telematic tools for collaborative work.
For this purpose a mixed method of investigation was used, consisting of an extensive questionnaire, followed by a focus group in which students were presented orally with the same items as the questionnaire, and asked to comment on them. Because the two methods utilized the same items, the results obtained will be presented concurrently in this article. Notable conclusions and implications include the students’ ability to recognize of a great deal of digital competence; that communication through the Internet is done mainly for personal reasons, and is especially associated with leisure and entertainment, much more so than for academic or professional reasons; that most students connect to the internet more than 30 hours per week; that all student groups show a preference towards teamwork over individual work, elucidating that teamwork at the university and in the working world are qualitatively different; that the mediums most used to communicate with acquaintances and friends are the WhatsApp application as well as the social networks, as opposed to direct oral communication as it has been in the recent past.
Downloads
References
Area, M., Gros, B., y Marzal, M. A. (2008). El multialfabetismo. En M. Area, B. Gros y M. A. Marzal (Eds.), Alfabetizaciones y tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (pp. 61-76). Madrid: Síntesis.
Blasco, J. E., Mengual, A. S., y Roig, R. (2007). Competencias tecnológicas en el espacio europeo de educación superior. Propuesta de formación del maestro especialista en educación física. Revista Profesorado, 11(2), 1-16
Cassany, D. y Sanz, G. (2009). El comentario de textos electrónicos. Textos de Didáctica de la Lengua y de la Literatura, 52, 21-31.
Cabero, J. (2012). La educación a distancia hacia el e-learning 2.0: la interacción como variable de éxito. En M. Moreno (Coord.) Veinte visiones de la educación a distancia (pp. 247-248). Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara.
Durall, E., Gros, B., Maina, M., Johnson, L. y Adams, S. (2012). Perspectivas tecnológicas: educación superior en Iberoamérica 2012-2017. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Espuny, C., González, J., Lleixá, M. y Gisbert, M. (2011). Actitudes y expectativas del uso educativo de las redes sociales en los alumnos universitarios. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC). 8 (1): 171-185. Disponible en: http://rusc.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v8n1-espuny-gonzalez-lleixa-gisbert/v8n1-espuny-gonzalez-lleixa-gisbert.
Gisbert, M., Espuny, C., y González, J. (2011). Cómo trabajar la competencia digital con estudiantes universitarios. En R. Roig Vila y C. Lavene (Eds). La práctica educativa en la sociedad de la información: Innovación a través de la investigación (pp. 157-174). Alcoy-Brescia: Marfil & La Scuola Editrice.
Gómez del Castillo, M.T. y Durá, C. (2011). Experiencia universitaria interdisciplinar apoyada por las TIC. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 55(3), 1-11. Disponible en: http://www.rieoei.org/expe/4173Gomez.pdf.
Gutiérrez Castillo, J.J. (2013). Estudio de la competencia digital del alumnado de Educación Superior. Un análisis de las titulaciones de Grado de Educación Infantil y Primaria en la Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía. (Tesis doctoral inédita). Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.
Martín, V y Cabero, J (2013). Latin American university students’ perceptions of social networks and group work. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal. 10 (2), 219-235. Disponible en: http://journals.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v10n2-cabero-marin/v10n2-cabero-marin-eng.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1.065-1.078.
Rodríguez Cárdenas, D. E. (Ed.) (2013). Tuning America latina. Educación Superior en América Latina. Bilbao: Publicaciones Universidad de Deusto
Rowsell, J. & Walsh , M. (2011). Rethinking Literacy Education in New Times: Multimodality, Multiliteracies, & New Literacies. Brock Education, 21(1), 53-62.
Sancho, J.M. (2009). La tecnología educativa en un mundo tecnologizado. En J.De Pablos (Coord.). Tecnología educativa. La formación del profesorado en la era de Internet (45-67). Málaga: Aljibe.
Sartori, G. (2004). Homo videns. La sociedad teledirigida. Madrid: Taurus.
Smarkola, C. (2008). Developmentally responsive technology-literacy use in education: Are teachers helping students meet grade-level national technology standards? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(4), 387.
Sutton, S. R. (2011). The preservice technology training experiences of novice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(1), 39-47.
Tuñez, M. y García, J. (2012). Las redes sociales como entorno docente: análisis del uso de Facebook en la docencia universitaria. Pixel Bit. 41, 77-92.
Watson, R. (2011). Mentes del Futuro ¿está cambiando la era digital nuestras mentes?. Barcelona: Viceversa.
How to Cite
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Any authors who publish with this journal accept the following terms: