Discourses and pedagogical practices in art museums

Authors

  • Amaia Arriaga Universidad Pública de Navarra, España.
  • Imanol Agirre Universidad Pública de Navarra, España.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35362/rie530567

Keywords:

museum; education; art; interpretation

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to present a methodological system that allows us to analyze the ideas museums and teachers have on art and interpretation. Ideas that, conscious or unconsciously, determine the educative practices deployed at museums.
The model presents four main ways of conceiving art and interpretation that can be found, and are usually found, in educative contexts. These ideas are displayed in order, starting with more visual o perceptive theories, and ending with more experience-complex theories: The first theory considers the work of art as an event and a visual representation, and interpretation as identification. The second theory considers the work of art as sign or message that has to be unveiled and interpretation as decoding. The third theory considers the work of art as an intellectual, historic and cultural event, and interpretation as chance to reflect, to critically comprehend and to culturally review. The last theory considers the work of art as the materialization of an experience and interpretation as the intersection of experiences and an opportunity for identity development.
The system can be applied in order to make museums and teachers more conscious of the foundations that guide their practices and as a tool for improving educative practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Amaia Arriaga, Universidad Pública de Navarra, España.

Profesora del área de Didáctica de la Expresión Plástica en el Departamento de Psicología y Pedagogía de la Universidad Pública de Navarra, España.

Imanol Agirre, Universidad Pública de Navarra, España.

Profesor titular de Didáctica de la Expresión Plástica de la Universidad Pública de Navarra, España.

References

Agirre, Imanol (2000). Teorías y prácticas en educación artística. Pamplona: Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA).

Barrett, Terry (2000). «“Studies” Invited Lecture: About Art Interpretation for Art Education», en Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research in Art Education, vol. 42, n.º 1.

Barthes, Roland (1980). S/Z. Madrid: Siglo XXI.

Barthes, Roland (1993). «La muerte del autor», en Image, Music, Text. Londres: Fontana Press.

Dewey, John (1987). «Art as Experience», en Later Works of John Dewey. Vol. 10. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Eco, Umberto (1985). Obra abierta. Barcelona: Planeta Agostini.

Garoian, Charles R. (2001). «Performing the Museum», en Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research in Art Education, vol. 42, n.º 3.

Geertz, Clifford (1994). Conocimiento local. Barcelona: Paidós.

Green, Maxine (2005). Liberar la imaginación. Ensayos sobre educación, arte y cambio social. Barcelona: Graó.

Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean (1992). Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge. Londres: Routledge.

Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean (1999). The Educational Role of the Museum. Londres: Routledge.

Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean (2004). «Changing Values in the Art Museum: Rethinking Communication and Learning», en Bettina M. Carbonell (ed.) Museum Studies. An Anthology of Contexts. Londres: Blackwell.

Hubard, Olga (2007). «Productive Information: Contextual Knowledge in Art Museum Education», en Art Education, vol. 60, n.º 4.

Lachapelle, Richard; Murray, Deborah y Neim, Sandy (2003). «Aesthetic Understanding as Informed Experience: The Role of Knowledge in Our Art Viewing Experiences», en Journal of Aesthetic Education, vol. 37, n.º 3.

Lankford, Louis (2002). «Aesthetic Experience in Constructivist Museums», en Journal of Aesthetic Education, vol. 36, n.º 2.

McLean, Kathleen (1999). «Museum Exhibitions and the Dynamics of Dialogue», en Dædalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, número titulado America’s Museums, vol. 128, n.º 3.

Meszaros, Cheryl (2007a). «Interpretation and the Hermeneutic Turn», en Engage 20. Strategic Interpretation.

Meszaros, Cheryl (2007b). «Interpretation in the Reign of “Whatever”», en Muse. The Voice of Canada’s Museum Community, vol. 25, n.º 1. Disponible en: <http://25538.vws.magma.ca/media/Pdf/Muse_Feature/2007/muse_1-2.07_E.pdf>.

Padró, Carla (2005). «Educación artística en museos y centros de arte», en Ricard Huerta y Román de la Calle (eds.) La mirada inquieta. Educación artística y museos. Valencia: Publicacions de la Universitat de València (PUV).

Rorty, Richard (1992). «El progreso del pragmatista», en Umberto Eco y otros. Interpretación, sobreinterpretación. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Reese, Elizabeth B. (2003). «Art Takes Me There: Engaging the Narratives of Community Members through Interpretative Exhibition Processes and Programming», en Art Education, vol. 56, n.º 1.

Roberts, Lisa (1997). From Knowledge to Narrative. Educators and the Changing Museum. Washington y Londres: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Shusterman, Richard (2002). Estética pragmatista: viviendo la belleza, repensando el arte. Barcelona: Idea Books.

Wallach, Alan (1998). Exhibiting Contradiction. Essays on the Art Museum in the United States. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.

How to Cite

Arriaga, A., & Agirre, I. (2010). Discourses and pedagogical practices in art museums. Iberoamerican Journal of Education, 53, 203–223. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie530567

Published

2010-05-01