Open social learning in higher education. Opportunities and challenges

Authors

  • Inés Gil-Jaurena Facultad de Educación, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), España
  • Daniel Domínguez Figaredo Facultad de Educación, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35362/rie600452

Keywords:

distance education; open social learning; e-learning; higher education

Abstract

The paper analyzes the potential of Open Social Learning (osl) in distance higher education. After discussing several aspects about the most widespread technological tools in this areas, as the Learning Management Systems (lms), the osl concept and its most important characteristics are reviewed: the openness idea, the social character and the centrality of the learning process. We review the opportunities offered to facilitate aspects such as the generation of personal learning environments (ple), the creation of a community; the validation of collective content, etc. However, the introduction of osl generates reticence and presents challenges for its integration in higher education systems, challenges that are also analyzed and that are linked, primarily, to the management process on the change of the process of the pedagogical model and the evaluation of learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ballesteros, Belén, Gil-Jaurena, Inés y Mata, Patricia (2010). «Hacia dónde se dirige la innovación metodológica en la uned. Una contribución al debate», en Patricia Ávila (coord.), cread: Educación a distancia: actores y experiencias. México/Loja: cread/ilce/utpl, pp. 459-476.

Díaz, Rubén y Freire, Juan (eds.) (2012). Educación expandida. Sevilla: Zemos98.
Domínguez, Daniel (2009). «La organización red en educación a distancia». Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia (ried), vol. 12, n.º 1, pp. 15-36, Disponible en: www.utpl.edu.ec/ried/?q=es/node/317, [consulta: julio de 2012].

— (2011). «El Open & Social Learning y su potencial de transformación socioeducativa», en Gloria Pérez (coord.), Intervención sociocomunitaria. Madrid: uned, pp. 183-206.

— y Álvarez, José Francisco (2012). «Redes sociales y espacios universitarios. Conocimiento e innovación abierta en el espacio iberoamericano del conocimiento». rusc. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, vol. 9, n.º 1, pp. 51-64. Disponible en: http://rusc.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v9n1-dominguez-alvarez/v9n1-dominguezalvarez, [consulta: julio de 2012].

Downes, Stephen (2005). «E-learning 2.0». eLearn Magazine. Education and Technology in Perspective. Disponible en: www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1, [consulta: julio de 2012].

Gil-Jaurena, Inés (en prensa). «Openness in higher education». Open Praxis, 5 (1), Oslo, International Council for Open and Distance Education (icde).

Himanen, Pekka (2001). The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age. Nueva York: Random House.

Seely Brown, John y Adler, Richard P. (2008). «Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0.». Educause Review. Disponible en: www.johnseelybrown.com/mindsonfire.pdf, [consulta: julio de 2012].

Senge, Peter (1992). La quinta disciplina. El arte y la práctica de la organización abierta al aprendizaje. Barcelona: Granica.

Siemens, George (2004). «Connectivism: a Learning Theory for the Digital Age». Elearnspace. Everything elearning. Disponible en: www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm, [consulta: julio de 2012].

Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (uoc) (2010). El Open Social Learning y su potencial de transformación de los contextos de educación superior en España. Barcelona: eLearn Center, uoc. Disponible en: http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/bitstream/10609/2062/6/informe_OSL_final.pdf.

Wenger, Etienne (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

How to Cite

Gil-Jaurena, I., & Domínguez Figaredo, D. (2012). Open social learning in higher education. Opportunities and challenges. Iberoamerican Journal of Education, 60, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie600452

Published

2012-09-01