Skills in end-of-degree project: Development and assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35362/rie71146Keywords:
Collaborative work; End-of-degree project; Skills assessment; Skills development.Abstract
Since the entry into force of new degrees, end-of-degree projects, whose goal could be theoretical or practical, is required to obtain a degree qualification. In this work, degree rules compel to carry out a highly practical proposal. Furthermore, pupils have a great opportunity not only for developing degree skills but also for implementing different acquired skills for their degree studies. This study develops a new work methodology, based on student autonomy, in which the continuing improvement is achieved through a feed-back system.
Downloads
References
Achtenhagen, F. (2001). “Criteria for the development of complex teaching-learning environments”. Instructional Science, 29, 361–381.
Arguelles, A. & Gonczi, A. (2000). “Competency based education and training: a world perspective”. Perú: Grupo Noriega Editores.
Aznar, P. & Ull, M. A. (2009). “La formación de competencias básicas para el desarrollo sostenible: el papel de la Universidad”. Revista de Educación, 219-237.
De Miguel, M. (2006). “Metodologías de enseñanza y aprendizaje para el desarrollo de competencias”. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Enkenberg, J. (2001). “Instructional design and emerging teaching models in higher education”. Computers in Human Behavior 17, 495–506.
González, J. M.; Arquero, José L. & Hassall, Trevor. (2009). “Bologna and beyond: A comparative study focused on UK and Spanish accounting education”. Higher Education in Europe, 34(1), 113-25.
Gonzalez, J. M.; Arquero, José L. & Hassall, Trevor. (2012). “The change towards a teaching methodology based on competences: a case study in a Spanish university”. Research Papers in Education, 29(1), 111-130.
Gunstone, R. F. (1991). “Reconstructing theory from practical experience”. Practical science, 67-77.
Gunstone, R. F. & Champagne, Albert B. (1990). Promoting conceptual change in the laboratory. The student laboratory and the science curriculum, 159-182.
Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (2002). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.
Hoogveld, A. W. M. Paas, F. & Jochems, M. G. (2005). Training higher education teachers for instructional design of competency-based education: Product-oriented versus process-oriented worked examples. Teaching and teacher education, 21(3), 287-297.
http://www.fquim.us.es/portal/C20/descargas/Uno/Id/X3173/Memoria+G_Quimica_con_Alegaciones.pdf. 2014
Karplus, R. (1977). Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 169-175.
Keen, K. (1992). Competence: What is it and how can it be developed. Brussels: IBM International Education Center.
López, J. I. (2011). Un giro copernicano en la enseñanza universitaria: formación por competencias. Revista de Educación, 356, 279-301.
Martínez, M. & Carrasco, S. (2006). Propuestas para el cambio docente en la universidad. Barcelona: Octaedro-ICE.
Paricio, J. (2010). El reto de institucionalizar la coordinación e integración docente. Barcelona: Equipos docentes y nuevas identidades académicas
Ramos, A., Delgado, F., Afonso, P., Cruchinho, A., Pereira, P., Sapeta, P. & Ramos, G. (2013) Implementación de nuevas prácticas pedagógicas en la Educación Superior. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 26(1), 115-141.
Samuelowicz, K. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education 41, 299–325.
Van Merriënboer, J. G. & de Croock, B. M. (2002). “Performance-based ISD: 10 steps to complex learning” Performance Improvement, 41, 33-39.
Wals, A. (2011). “Learning Our Way to Sustainability. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development”, 5(2), 177–186.
Woolnough, B. E. (1991). Setting the scene. Buckingham: Practical science.
How to Cite
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Any authors who publish with this journal accept the following terms:
