Formación docente. Construcción negociada de un personaje y de un escenario

María Soledad Manrique

doi:10.35362/rie70257

Authors

María Soledad Manrique

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35362/rie70257

Keywords:

continuing teacher education; lifelong education; attitude change-interviews; social interaction

Abstract
References
Statistics
How to Cite

Abstract

In the present work the analysis of the involvement of a preschool teacher in a complex training device will allow us to show some of the features of the teacher education process related to its intersubjective aspects. The device was intended to promote the development of knowledge and skills that would enable teachers to build a series of strategies to scaffold the development of children´s narrative in activities such as retelling of personal experiences and story- reading. The teacher education device offered a group and an individual instance. The individual instance consisted of interviews in which the teacher and the teacher trainer analyzed the activities carried out by the teacher, which had been previously videofilmed and transcribed. It has been hypothesized that in this interview each of the parts uses discourse to build for the other and for themselves a character and scenery and that this construction is then negotiated. On the basis of the qualitative analysis of the interviews the way in which the construction of this character and of the scenery is carried out, the movements that this construction suffers in the confrontation with other possible definitions and the changes in the teacher´s attitude are described.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses. Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 308–319.

Arfuch, L. (2010). La entrevista. Una invención dialógica. Bs.As: Paidós.

Bahtin, M. (1982). Estética de la creación verbal. México: Siglo XXI.

Barbier, J. M. (1999). Prácticas de formación. Evaluación y Análisis. Formación de Formadores. Serie los Documentos. Vol. 9. Bs. As: Edición Novedades Educativas.

Bower, M., Cavanagh, M., Moloney, R. & Dao, M.M. (2011). Developing communication competence using an online Video Reflection system: pre-service teachers’ experiences. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 311–326.

Charteris, J. & Smardon, D. (2013). Second look – second think: a fresh look at video to support dialogic feedback in peer coaching. Professional Development in Education, 39(2), 168–185.

Chun Hu , L. S., Crawford, L., Gopinathan , S., Khine M. S., Moo, S. N. & Wong, A. (2000). Using lesson video clips via multipoint desktop video conferencing to facilitate reflective practice. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 377-388.

Clot, Y. (2006). A func̨ao psicológica do trabalho. Río de Janeiro: Vozes.

Danielowich, R. M. (2014). Shifting the reflective focus: encouraging student teacher learning in video-framed and peer-sharing contexts. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 20(3), 264-288.

Ferry, G. (1997). Pedagogía de la formación. Serie Formación de formadores No 6. Bs.As: Ed. Novedades Educativas.

Hermans, H. J. M.,. Kempen, H. J. G & Van Loon, R. J. P. (1992). The Dialogical Self: Beyond Individualism and Rationalism. American Psychologist, 47, 23–33.

Kersting, N. B.; Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L. & Stigler, J. W. (2010). Teachers’ Analyses of Classroom Video Predict Student Learning of Mathematics: Further Explorations of a Novel Measure of Teacher Knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 172-181

Krippendorf, K. (1990). Método de análisis de contenido. Teoría y Práctica. Bs. As: Paidós.

Manrique, M. S. & Borzone, A.M. (2012). La formación transforma. El caso de una madre cuidadora. Educere, 16 (53), 171-186.

Manrique, M. S. (2013). La lectura de cuentos en el Jardín de Infantes. Una práctica que se transforma. Revista del IICE, 30, 163-182.

Manrique, M. S. (2014). Relatos de experiencias personales en el Jardín de Infantes potenciados por un dispositivo de formación docente. Revista Panorama 8 (14), 20-32 (enero – junio 2014). Institución Universitaria Politécnico Grancolombiano.

Mevorach, M. & Strauss, S. (2012). Teacher Educators’ In-Action Mental Models in Different Teaching Situations. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 18(1), 25-41.

Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development. Cambridge: University Press.

Perrenoud, P. (2001). Développer la pratique réflexive dans le metier dénseignant: Proffessionalisation et raison pédagogique. Paris: ESF Editeur.

Ricoeur, P. (2006). Del texto a la acción. Bs. As.: Fondo de cultura económica.

Santagata, R. & Angelici, G. (2010). Studying the Impact of the Lesson Analysis Framework on Preservice Teachers’ Abilities to Reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 339-349.

Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in preservice teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10,123-140.

Scheuer, N. & Pozo, J. I. (2006). ¿Qué cambia en las teorías implícitas sobre el aprendizaje y la enseñanza? Dimensiones y procesos del cambio representacional. En J. I. Pozo, N. Scheuer, M. P. P. Echeverría, M. Mateos, E. Martin & M. de la Cruz (Eds.), Nuevas formas de pensar la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Las concepciones de profesores y alumnos (pp. 375– 402). España: Graó.

Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Smith, B. & Sparkes, A. C. (2008). Contrasting Perspectives on Narrating Selves and Identities: An Invitation to Dialogue. Qualitative Research, 8 (1), 5–35.

Souto, M. (1999). Grupos y Dispositivos de Formación. Serie Formación de Formadores, 10. Bs. As: Novedades Educativas.

Stenberg, K., Karlsson, L., Pitkaniemi, H. & Maaranen, K. (2014). Beginning student teachers’ teacher identities based on their practical theories, European Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (2), 204-219.

Taylor, S. J. & Bodgan, R. (1987). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidós.

Varghese, M., B., Morgan, B., Johnston, B & Johnson, K. A. (2005). Theorizing Language Teacher Identity: Three Perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 4(1), 21–44.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Winnicott, D. W. (2012). Realidad y juego. Buenos Aires: Gedisa Editorial.

Yamashita, Y., & Nakajima, T. (2010). Using a new information system for analysis of the relation between presentation skills and understandability. En Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2010 (pp. 3162–3167). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

Zeichner, K. M. (1994). Research on teacher thinking and different views of reflective practice in teaching and teacher education. En I. Carlgren, G. Nadal, S. Vaage (Eds.), Teachers´minds and actions. Research on teachers´ Thinking and Practice. London: Falmer Press.

How to Cite

Manrique, M. S. (2016). Teacher education. Negotiated construction of character and stage. Iberoamerican Journal of Education, 70(2), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie70257