Usar la lengua en la escuela

Authors

  • Liliana Tolchinsky Universidad de Barcelona, España.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35362/rie460715

Keywords:

reading learning process; use of language; non-linguistic curricular areas; school culture; critical and intelligent readers

Abstract

The goal of the reading-writing learning process is, in a broad sense, to have new members of the community actively participating in those practices that need literate subjects. Since the objective is skillfulness in certain practices, the best way to achieve it is through submersion in authentic versions of those practices. Practices in which the use of language and the use of texts answer to intentions that go further than the mere teaching of reading and writing. Once the empiric evidence that supports this thesis is discussed, I’ll present an inter-disciplinary approach to reading and writing. According to this approach, the training of active members of written culture must be undertaken not only in language class, but in other non-linguistic curricular classes. Unlike what usually happens in language class, in which we have to create a necessity in order to insert a text in a meaningful way, in other classes we have to create texts that fulfill needs that already exist. In non-linguistic curricular areas is where there are more chances of using authentic texts in a meaningful way and with different purposes. The inter-disciplinary approach has found major issues in order to fulfill the requirements of text authenticity and diversity, of interaction between written and spoken language, and peers exchange of ideas. Among these issues were: exclusive use of text books, difficulties with starting diversified tasks inside the classroom and responsibility fragmentation. These issues show the crucial changes entailed by this approach and some regards that our school culture should overcome if we are to train critical and intelligent readers, citizens skilled at dealing with written information.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Liliana Tolchinsky, Universidad de Barcelona, España.

Profesora titular de la Facultad de Filología de la Universidad de Barcelona, España.

References

Bibliografía

Biber, Douglas (1995): Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge, ma: Cambridge University Press.

Cortázar, Julio (1962): Historia de cronopios y de famas. Buenos Aires: Minotauro (Metamorfosis).

Dehaene, Stanislas (2007): Les Neurones de la lecture. París: Odile Jacob.

Joshi, Malatesha y Aaron, P. G. (2000): «The Component Model of Reading: Simple View of Reading Made a Little more Complex», en Reading Psychology, vol. 21, n.º 2, pp. 85-97.

Jorba, Jaume, Gómez, Isabel y Prat, Angels (eds.) (1999): Parlar i escriure per aprendre: ús de la llengua en situació d’ensenyament-aprenentatge des de les àrees curriculars. Barcelona: Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación (ice), Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.

Karmiloff-Smith, Annette (1992): Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Cambridge, ma: mit Press/Bradford Books.

Manguel, Alberto (1996): A History of Reading. Londres: Harper Collins.

Moraïs, José (1994): L’Art de lire. París: Odile Jacob.

Olson, David (2007): «Three Ways of Thinking about Literacy», artículo presentado en el simposio Between Spoken and Written Language: What Makes a Literate Israeli Student?, organizado por la Academia Israelí de Ciencias y Humanidades, 15 de octubre, Jerusalén.

Ong, Walter (1997): Oralidad y escritura. Tecnologías de la palabra. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica (fce).

Pressley, Michel (2006): «What the Future of Reading Research Could Be», artículo presentado en el foro de la International Reading Association Research (ira), abril, Chicago, il. Disponible en: http://www.reading.org/publications/bbv/videos/voRRC06/abstracts/RRC-06-Pressley.html

Program for International Student Assessment (pisa) (2006): http://www.oecd.org/document/22/0,3343,en_2649_201185_39713238_ 1_1_1_1,00.html

Progress in International Reading Literacy Study 2006 (pirls) http://www.iea.nl/pirls2006.html

Purcell-Gates, Victoria, Duke, Nell K. y Martineau, Joseph A. (2007): «Learning to Read and Write Genre-Specific Text: Roles of Authentic Experience and Explicit Teaching», en Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 42, n.º 1, pp. 8-45. Disponible en: http://www.reading.org/Library/Retrieve.cfm?D=10.1598/RRQ.42.1.1&F= RRQ-42-1-Purcell-Gates.html

Ravid, Dorit y Tolchinsky, Liliana (2002): «Developing Linguistic Literacy: A Comprehensive Model», en Journal of Child Language, vol. 29, n.º 2, pp. 417-447.

Reber, Arthur S. (1989): «Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge», en Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 118, n.º 3, pp. 219–235.

Share, David L. (2004): «Orthographic Learning at a Glance: On the Time Course and Developmental Onset of Self Teaching», en Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol. 87, n.º 4, pp. 267-298.

Snow, Catherine, Burns, Susan M. y Griffin, Peg (2000): Un buen comienzo. Guía para promover la lectura en la infancia. México: Secretaría de Educación Pública.

The New London Group (1996): «A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures», en Harvard Educational Review, 66, spring, pp. 60-92.

The Purdue Online Writing Lab (owl). «Writing across the Curriculum and Writing in the Disciplines», en línea. Disponible en: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/WAC/

Tolchinsky, Liliana (2007): «Using Language at School», trabajo presentado en el simposio «Between Spoken and Written Language: What Makes a Literate Israeli Student?», organizado por la Academia Israelí de Ciencias y Humanidades, 15 de octubre, Jerusalén.

—(1990): «Lo práctico, lo científico y lo literario: tres componentes en la noción de “alfabetismo”», en CL & E: Comunicación, Lenguaje y Educación, n.º 6, pp. 53-62.

— y Simó, Rosa (2003): Escribir y leer a través del curriculum. Barcelona: Horsori. (Cuadernos de Educación.)

Triebel, Armin (2005): «Literacy in Developed and Developing Countries», en N. Bascia, A. y otros (eds.) International Handbook of Educational Policy. Dordrecht: Springer (pp. 793-812).

Tynjälä, Päivi, Mason, Lucia y Lonka, Kirsti (2001): «Writing as a Learning Tool. An Introduction», en Päivi Tynjälä, Lucia Mason y Kirsti Lonka (eds.) Writing as a Learning Tool. Integrating Theory and Practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Whittlesea, Bruce W. A. y Wright, Richard L. (1997): Implicit (and Explicit) Learning: Acting Adaptively without Knowing the Consequences», en Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 23, n.º 1, pp. 181-200.

Notas:

1) Algunos aspectos de este artículo fueron presentados en el trabajo «Using Language at School» en el simposio Between Spoken and Written Language: What Makes a Literate Israeli Student?, organizado por la Academia Israelí de Ciencias y Humanidades, en la ciudad de Jerusalén, el 15 de octubre de 2007.

2) Recent work in cognitive science, social cognition, and sociocultural approaches to language and literacy argues that if one of our pedagogical goals is a degree of mastery in practice, then immersion in a community of learning engaged in authentic versions of such practice is necessary.

How to Cite

Tolchinsky, L. (2008). Usar la lengua en la escuela. Iberoamerican Journal of Education, 46, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie460715

Published

2008-01-01