Knowledge and valuation of micro-credentials among online university students: predictive evidence from Ecuador

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35362/rie10117365

Keywords:

microcredentials, employability, higher education, distance education, student achievement

Abstract

The expansion of micro-credentials in Latin American higher education contrasts with limited empirical evidence on the factors shaping students' valuation of these certifications. This study examined, among 129 ninth-cycle students of the Online Basic Education program at UNEMI (Ecuador), the extent to which conceptual knowledge (X₁) and perceived employability (X₃) predict micro-credential valuation (Y), using a quantitative non-experimental cross-sectional design. The ECVM-26 instrument was validated with Aiken's V = .926 and α = .990. Overall valuation was favorable (M = 3.93/5), with academic utility as the highest-rated dimension (M = 4.04). Perceived employability was the sole significant predictor (r = .944, p < .001; β = 1.429, p < .001; R² = .892). A Monte Carlo bootstrap mediation analysis (50,000 iterations) confirmed that conceptual knowledge affects valuation exclusively through perceived employability (indirect effect = 0.289, 95% CI [0.215, 0.363]; Sobel z = 7.71, p < .001), with no significant direct path (β = −0.006, p = .757). Gender and employment status produced no significant effects. Findings support educational signaling theory and indicate that micro-credential adoption requires explicit alignment with labor-market-recognized competencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elian Jamil Hernández Cueva, Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ecuador

Licenciado en Ciencias de la Educación mención "Educación Básica" por la Universidad Nacional de Loja. Investigador registrado en el Sistema Nacional de Información de Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación y Conocimientos Tradicionales con el No. REGINV-26-09620. Embajador por el Estado Abierto por Fundación DATALAT.ORG. Activista social avalado por el Aspire Institute de Harvard Business School.

Carlos Eduardo Rojas Pérez, Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ecuador

 Licenciado en Pedagogía del Idioma Inglés por la Universidad Estatal de Milagro; Ingeniero en Sistemas Informáticos y Computación por la Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja; Máster Universitario en Educación Especial por la Universidad Internacional de La Rioja; Magíster en Pedagogía de los Idiomas Nacionales y Extranjeros, mención en Enseñanza del Idioma Inglés, por la Universidad Casa Grande; Máster Universitario en Tecnología Educativa y Competencias Digitales por la Universidad Internacional de La Rioja; Diplomado en TIC y Discapacidad por la Universidad Politécnica Salesiana; y Doctorando en Educación por la Universidad Católica de Santa Fe.

References

Acemoglu, D., y Restrepo, P. (2022). Tasks, automation, and the rise in US wage inequality. Econometrica, 90(5), 1973–2016. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA19815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA19815

Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. J., y Pierce, C. A. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

American Psychological Association [APA]. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7.ª ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

Banco Mundial. (2022). Closing the skills gap: New options for higher education in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank Group. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/37617

Baron, R. M., y Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173

Brown, M., Nic Giolla Mhichíl, M., Beirne, E., y Mac Lochlainn, C. (2021). The global micro-credential landscape: Charting a new credential ecology for lifelong learning. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(2), 228–254. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v8i2.525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v8i2.525

Cabero-Almenara, J., Gutiérrez-Castillo, J. J., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., y Gaete-Bravo, A. F. (2023). Digital competence of higher education students as a predictor of academic success. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(2), 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09624-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09624-8

Castaño-Muñoz, J., Kreijns, K., Kalz, M., y Punie, Y. (2017). Does digital competence and occupational setting influence MOOC participation? Evidence from a cross-course survey. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9123-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9123-z

Centro Europeo para el Desarrollo de la Formación Profesional [Cedefop]. (2020). Briefing note: Skills forecast 2020—Key trends to 2030. Publications Office of the European Union. https://go.oei.int/jp9luxwq

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Comisión Europea. (2022). A European approach to micro-credentials for lifelong learning and employability. Publications Office of the European Union. https://education.ec.europa.eu/education-levels/higher-education/micro-credentials

Coursera. (2025). Micro-credentials impact report 2025 [Informe técnico]. Coursera Inc. https://go.oei.int/8y6fltmm

Creswell, J. W., y Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5.ª ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeVellis, R. F., y Thorpe, C. T. (2022). Scale development: Theory and applications (5.ª ed.). SAGE Publications.

Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Flanagan, C. A., Miller, C., Reuman, D. A., y Yee, D. (1989). Self-concepts, domain values, and self-esteem: Relations and changes at early adolescence. Journal of Personality, 57(2), 283–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00484.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00484.x

Ehlers, U. D., y Kellermann, S. A. (2019). Future skills: The future of learning and higher education. Steinbeis-Edition.

Escurra, L. M. (1988). Cuantificación de la validez de contenido por criterio de jueces. Revista de Psicología de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 6(1–2), 103–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.198801-02.008

Eysenbach, G., y Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. British Medical Journal, 323(7321), 1103–1105. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5.ª ed.). SAGE Publications.

Gasskov, V. (2021). Bridging the skills gap with micro-credentials: An international comparative study. International Journal of Training and Development, 25(4), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12227

González-Pérez, L. I., y Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., y Dicke, T. (2018). Cross-cultural generalizability of social and dimensional comparison effects on reading, math, and science self-concepts for primary school students using the combined PIRLS and TIMSS data. Learning and Instruction, 58, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.007

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., y Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8.ª ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2.ª ed.). The Guilford Press.

Hermida, P., y Petrovic, N. (2023). Brechas de habilidades en los trabajadores jóvenes en Ecuador. Cuestiones Económicas, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.47550/RCE/33.2.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47550/RCE/33.2.1

Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., y Baptista-Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J., y Jones, R. (2018). Independent learning – what we do when you’re not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos [INEC]. (2025). Encuesta nacional de empleo, desempleo y subempleo (ENEMDU): Resultados enero 2025. INEC Ecuador. https://go.oei.int/6h9hrfsh

Johan, R. C., Rullyana, G., Susilana, R., y Emilzoli, M. (2024). Micro-credentials in higher education: A review and bibliometric. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(2), 1103–1116. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i2.21281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i2.21281

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales [LOPDP]. (2021). Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales del Ecuador. Registro Oficial Suplemento 459, 26 de mayo de 2021. Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. https://go.oei.int/3f88socd

Mateo-Berganza Díaz, M. M., Lim, J. R., Cardenas Navia, I., y Elzey, K. (2022). A world of transformation: Moving from degrees to skills-based alternative credentials. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://doi.org/10.18235/0004299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0004299

Maxwell, S. E., y Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23

McGreal, R., y Olcott, D. (2022). A strategic reset: Micro-credentials for higher education leaders. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00190-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00190-1

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Oliver, B. (2019). Making micro-credentials work for learners, employers and providers. Deakin University. https://go.oei.int/wruz6qgu

Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos [OEI]. (2022). Panorama de las microcredenciales en educación superior de Iberoamérica. OEI. https://go.oei.int/u6gnip6e

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura [UNESCO-IESALC]. (2025). Micro-credentials for lifelong learning and development. UNESCO-IESALC. https://go.oei.int/unsa5eem

Orr, D., Weller, M., y Farrow, R. (2019). How is digitalisation affecting the flexibility and openness of higher education provision? Results of a global survey using a new conceptual model. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.523

Ralston, S. J. (2021). Higher education’s microcredentialing craze: A postdigital-Deweyan critique. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00121-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00121-8

Rama, C. (2021). La nueva educación híbrida. Cuadernos de Universidades. Unión de Universidades de América Latina y el Caribe (UDUAL).

Reglamento General de Protección de Datos [GDPR]. (2016). Reglamento (UE) 2016/679 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea, L 119, 1–88. https://www.boe.es/doue/2016/119/L00001-00088.pdf

Richardson, M., Abraham, C., y Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838

Rullyana, G., Siregar, E., y Kustandi, C. (2025). Research trends on micro-credentials in higher education: A bibliometric analysis using Scopus and WoS databases. Journal of Learning for Development, 12(3), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v12i3.1950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v12i3.1950

Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación [SENESCYT]. (2022). Estadísticas de educación superior, ciencia, tecnología e innovación. SENESCYT. https://www.senescyt.gob.ec/estadisticas

Spence, A. M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., y Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified theory. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.

Wheelahan, L., y Moodie, G. (2021). Gig qualifications for the gig economy: Micro-credentials and the ‘hungry mile.’ Higher Education, 83(6), 1279–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00742-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00742-3

Wigfield, A., y Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

World Economic Forum. (2023). Future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum. https://go.oei.int/eql84osl

World Medical Association. (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Yavas Celik, G., y Toprak, E. (2026). Micro-credentials in higher education: A systematic review for quality aspects. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 27(1), 103–134. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1651469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1651469

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., y Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

How to Cite

Hernández Cueva, E. J., & Rojas Pérez, C. E. (2026). Knowledge and valuation of micro-credentials among online university students: predictive evidence from Ecuador. Iberoamerican Journal of Education, 101(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie10117365

Published

2026-07-15

Issue

Section

Transformación educativa y laboral a través de las microcredenciales en Iberoamérica