El profesor en el centro del debate sobre la eficacia de la enseñanza: meta-síntesis del impacto de las características del docente
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35362/rie9015434Palabras clave:
Características del profesor, Eficacia del profesor, Meta-análisis, Revisión SistemáticaResumen
El propósito de este estudio es sintetizar los resultados de la evidencia acumulada de un conjunto extenso de investigaciones primarias a través de los estudios de síntesis cuantitativa y cualitativa (meta-análisis y revisiones sistemáticas) que examinan la relación entre las características del docente y diversas medidas de eficacia y calidad de la enseñanza. En esta meta-síntesis se integran los resultados de 6 trabajos que facilitan la descripción de sus características en su propio contexto, junto con un análisis de las tendencias que trascienden a todos ellos. Los resultados muestran que las características cognitivas y de trayectoria académica del docente se integran en modelos amplios, aunque con un impacto muy moderado en el mejor de los casos. Los estudios sobre motivación son esencialmente descriptivos, si bien permiten hacer comparaciones en función del contexto socio-económico y cultural de los docentes gracias al uso de herramientas de medida comunes. Esta meta-síntesis pone de manifiesto que se necesita más investigación a gran escala con instrumentos validados y muestras comparables. Pero, sobre todo, se precisa de una investigación basada en una fundamentación teórica sólida que aborde de manera integrada los efectos precisos de las características del docente sobre la calidad de la enseñanza.
Descargas
Citas
* Aloe, A. M. y Becker, B. J. (2009). Teacher verbal ability and school outcomes: where is the evidence? Educational Researcher, 38(8). 612-624.
Atteberry, A., Loeb, S. y Wyckoff, J. (2015). Do first impressions matter? Predicting early career teacher effectiveness. AERA Open, 1(4), 1–23.
*Bardach y Klassen (2020). Smart teachers, successful students? A systematic review of the literature on teachers’ cognitive abilities and teacher effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 30, 1-21.
Chetty, R., Friedman, J.N. y Rockoff, J.E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. The American Economic Review, 104, 2593-2632.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2º ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., y Weinfeld, E D. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
*D’Agostino, J. V. y Powers, S. J. (2009) Predicting Teacher Performance with Test Scores and Grade Point Average: A Meta-Analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 146-182.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 35-47.
*Fray, L. y Gore, J. (2018). Why people choose teaching: A scoping review of empirical studies, 2007–2016. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 153-163.
Gill, B., Shoji, M., Coen, T. y Place, K. (2016). The content, predictive power, and potential bias in widely used teacher observation instruments (REL 2017-191). Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic.
Grissom, J.A. y Loeb, S. (2017). Assessing principals’ assessments: subjective evaluations of teacher effectiveness in low and high-stakes environments. Education Finance and Policy, 12, 369-395.
Hamre, B.K, Pianta, R.C., Downer, J.T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A.J. y Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113, 461-487.
Hattie, J. A. (2008). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge
Hattie, J. A. (2011). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. Routledge.
*Heinz, M. (2015). Why Choose Teaching? An International Review of Empirical Studies Exploring Student Teachers’ Career Motivations and Levels of Commitment to Teaching. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(3): 258–297.
Hobson, A.J., Ashby, P., McIntyre, J. y Malderez, A. (2010). International approaches to teacher selection and recruitment. OECD education working papers. OECD Publishing nº 47.
Jackson, C.K., Rockoff, J.E. y Staiger, D.O. (2014). Teacher effects and teacher-related policies. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 801-825.
*Klassen, R, y Kim, L. E. (2019). Selecting teachers and prospective teachers: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 26, 32–51.
Klassen, R.M. y Tze, V.M.C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76.
Kunter, M., Kleickmann, T., Klusmann, U. y Richter, D. (2013). The development of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss y M. Neubrand (Eds.). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 63-77). Springer.
Van der Lans, R.M., van de Grift, W.J. y van Veen, K. (2018). Developing an instrument for teacher feedback: using the Rasch model to explore teachers’ development of effective teaching strategies and behaviors. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86, 247-264.
Lankford, H., Loeb, S., McEachin, A., Miller, L. C., y Wyckoff, J. (2014). Who Enters Teaching? Encouraging Evidence That the Status of Teaching Is Improving. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 444–453.
Mujis, D., Kyriakides, L, van der Werf, G., Creemers, B., Timperley, H. y Earl, L. (2014). State of the art -teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25, 231-256.
Mujis, D., Reynolds, D., Sammons, Creemers, B. y Teddie, C. (2018). Assessing individual lessons using a generic teacher observation instrument: how useful is the international system for teacher observation and feedback (ISTOF)? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25, 231-256.
OECD (2005). Teachers matter. Attracting, developing, and retaining effective teachers. OECD education working papers. OECD Publishing.
Walsh, D. y Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 50(2), 204–211.
Watt, H.M.G. y Richardson, P.W. (2012). An introduction to teaching motivations in different countries: comparisons using the FIT-Choice scale. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 185-197
Cómo citar
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
