Preschool children participating in the educational research approach through the mosaic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35362/rie71011Keywords:
preschool education, research with children, mosaic approach.Abstract
In recent years several international organizations have recognized the importance of supporting early childhood development holistically and educational research has not been immune to this trend. However until now it has focused almost exclusively on knowing the adult perspective about childhood and children’s voice has been virtually excluded. Children are experts in their lives and are the most familiar with their interests and needs to establish itself as the protagonists of their lives. According to the concept of socially active child who builds their interactions with peers and adults with whom he or she lives we can expand the understanding we have about children in their socialization and learning processes. This work shows that the mosaic approach is a productive way to learn and to include the perspective of children in the research process regarding school environments in which they participate. It also constitutes an encouragement to imagine creative ways to reach their life experiences.
Downloads
References
Ainsworth, K. (2014). Rethinking Photography as Event. International Journal of child, youth and family Studies, 5(4.2), 741-750.
Argos, J., Ezquerra, M. P. y Castro, A. (2011). Escuchando la voz de la infancia en los procesos de cambio e investigación educativos. Aproximación al estudio de las transiciones entre las etapas de educación infantil y educación primaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 54(5), 1-18. Accesible en: www.rieoei.org/deloslectores/3988Argos.pdf
Barreto, M. (2011). Consideraciones ético-metodológicas para la investigación en educación inicial. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales. Niñez y Juventud, 2(9), 635-648.
Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S. y Pithouse, A. (2010). Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1046-1064.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1987). La ecología del desarrollo humano: experimentos en entornos naturales y diseñados. Barcelona: Paidós.
Buysee, V., Goldman, B. D. y Skinner, M. L. (2002). Setting Effects on Friendship Formation Among Young Children With and Without Disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68(4), 503-517.
Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century. Applications for advancing social justice studies. En N. Denzin y Y. Lincoln (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3.ª ed., pp. 507-535). Thoudand Oaks: Sage.
Christensen, P. y Allison, J. (2012). Research with Children. Perspectives and Practices. Londres: Routledge.
Christensen, P. y James, A. (eds.). (2000). Research with Children. Perspectives and Practices. Londres: Falmer Press.
Clark, A. y Moss, P. (2001). Listening to young children. The mosaic approach. Londres: National Childern’s Bureau.
Clark, A. y Moss, P. (2006). Listening to young children. The mosaic approach. Londres: National Children’s Bureau.
Clark, A., Kjorholt, A. T. y Moss, P. (2008). Beyond Listening. Children’s Perspectives on Early Childhood Services. Gran Bretaña: The Policy Press.
Corsaro, W. A. y Eder, D. (1990). Children’s Peer Cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 197-220. Indiana: Indiana University.
Corsaro, W. A. y Rizzo, T. A. (1988). Discussione and Friendship. Socialization Processes in the Peer Culture of Italian Nursery. School Children, 53(6), 879-894.
Corsaro, W. A. y Rizzo, T. A. (1995). Social Support Processes in Early Childhood Friendship. A Comparative Study of Ecological Congruences in Enacted Support. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(1), 389-417.
Dahlberg, G. y Moss, P. (2005). Ethics and Politics in Early Childhood Education. Londres: Routledge Falmer.
Danby, S. y Farell, A. (2004). Accounting for young Children’s competence in educational research: New perspectives on research ethics. Australian Educational Researcher, 31, 35-49.
Dávila, P. y Naya, L. M. (2011). Derechos de la infancia y educación inclusiva en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Granica, obtenido de http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/eserv.php?pid=bibliuned:reec-2012-20-5150&dsID=Documento.pdf el día 22 de enero de 2016.
Delgado, C. (2012). La teoría fundamentada: decisión entre perspectivas. Bloomington, IN.: AuthorHouse.
Delgado, M. A. (2009). Community Involvement in Services for Young Children,
Families and Communities. Accepting, resisting and proposing alternatives to mainstream views. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Muller.
Gaitán, L. (2006). La nueva sociología de la infancia. Aportaciones de una mirada distinta. Política y Sociedad, 43(1), 9-26.
Glasser, B. y Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies of Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
González, A. y Fritz, H. (2015). El diario de campo como herramienta para el análisis, la reflexividad, la interpretación y la toma de decisiones. Su uso en la investigación con niños. Guanajuato: Universidad de Guanajuato.
Levinas, E. (1991). Ética e infinito. Madrid: Antonio Machado.
Malaguzzi, L. (2001). La educación infantil en Reggio Emilia. Barcelona: Octaedro.
Mayall, B. (2003). Towards a Sociology for Childhood: Thinking from Children’s Lives. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Mertens, D. M. y Ginsberg, P. E. (2008). The Handbook of Social Research Ethics. EE. UU.: Sage.
Mukherji, P. y Albon, D. (2010). Research methods in early childhood. An introductory guide. Padstow: Sage Publications.
OECD (2006). Education at a Glace: OECD Indicators-2006 Edition. Obtenido de http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/37393408.pdf el día 9 de noviembre de 2014.
Palacios, J. y Castañeda, E. (2009). La primera infancia (0-6 años) y su futuro. OEI- Fundación Santillana.
Pavez, I. (2012). Sociología de la infancia: las niñas y los niños como actores sociales. Revista de Sociología, 27, 81-102.
Prout, A. y Allison, J. (1997). A New Paradigm for theSociology of Childhood? Provenance, Promise and Problems. Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood. Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. Londres: Falmer Press.
Punch, S. (2002). Research with children the same or different from research with adults. Childhood, 9(3), 321-341.
Qvortrup, J., Bardy, M., Sgritta, G. y Winteberger, H. (eds.). (1994). Childhood Matters: Social Theory, Practice and Politics. Aldershot: Aveburry Press.
Rinaldi, C. (2001). Documentation and assessment: What is the relationship? En C. Giudici, C. Rinaldi y M. Krechevsky (eds.), Making learning visible: Children as individual and group learners. Reggio Emilia, Italia: Reggio Children.
Rinaldi, C. (2006). In Dialogue with Reggio Emilia. Listening, researching and learning. EE. UU.: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Rodríguez, I. (2007). Para una sociología de la infancia: aspectos teóricos y metodológicos. Madrid: CIS.
Secretaría de Educación Pública (2011). Programa de estudios 2011. Guía para la educadora. Educación Básica Preescolar. México: SEP.
Smith, B., Taylor, N. J., Gallop, M. y Taylor (2010). Escuchemos a los niños. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Strauss, A. y Corbin, J. (1998). Grounded Theory Methodology. An Overview. En N. Denzin y Y. Lincoln (eds.). The Handbook of Qualitative Research: Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Zubizarreta, A., Ezquerro, P. y Argos, J. (2011). Dando voz y protagonismo a la infancia en los procesos de investigación e innovación educativos. Revista Fuentes, 11, 107-123.
How to Cite
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Any authors who publish with this journal accept the following terms:
