Pedagogical practice of geometry in youth and adult education: teaching and learning

Authors

  • Guilherme Saramago de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Silvana Malusá Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Euzane Maria Cordeiro Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Thaís Coutinho de Souza Silva Programa de Pós-Graduação da Faculdade de Educação

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35362/rie681172

Keywords:

YAE | Pedagogical Practice | Teaching and Learning | Teaching Geometry.

Abstract

This article presents results of a survey that aimed to identify, interpret and describe the methodology adopted by teachers of Youth and Adults Education (YAE) to teach quadrilaterals and parallelograms and check the main ideas assimilated by the students in this content. As theoretical foundations of the research were used, mainly, the development model of the geometric notion proposed by the educators Dina Van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre Van Hiele, the Mathematics Curriculum Guide (MINAS GERAIS, 1997), the Curricular Proposal intented to YAE (BRASIL, 2001), and Crowley Studies (2011) in the Van Hiele’s model. Two groups of reviewers were studied, the first consisting in five teachers and the second in ten students. To collect the data needed do develop the required search, an interview was recorded with the teachers, and was asked to the students to solve a practical activity involving the knowledge inherent in parallelograms quadrilaterals. With the study was found that the surveyed teachers develop their teaching predominantly by expositive and demonstrative manner with emphasis on transmission of information, considered essential, in view of geometric shapes’s images, the resolution of standard exercises, structures and elaborated based in informations that were passed on verbally and in models, suggested in differents textbooks. Due to these strategies and teaching procedures adopted by the teachers, students of YAE can’t dominate the fundamental properties that characterize the geometrical figures and end up having difficulties in identification of these forms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BRASIL. (1998). Ministério da Educação, Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: Matemática. Brasília: MEC/SEF.

BRASIL. (2001). Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Educação de Jovens e Adultos: proposta curricular para o 1º segmento do Ensino Fundamental. Brasília: Ação Educativa/MEC.

CROWLEY, M. L. (2011). O modelo Van Hiele de desenvolvimento do pensamento geométrico. In: LINDQUIST, M. M. e SHULTE, A. P. (orgs.). Aprendendo e Ensinando Geometria. Tradução: Hygino H. Domingues. São Paulo: Atual.

DANA, M. E. (2011). Geometria: um enriquecimento para a escola elementar. In: LINDQUIST, M. M. e SHULTE A. P. (orgs.). Aprendendo e Ensinando Geometria. Tradução: Hygino H. Domingues. São Paulo: Atual.

EVES, H. (2005). Tópicos de História da Matemática para uso em sala de aula: Geometria. São Paulo: Editora Atual.

FARREL, M. A. (2011). Geometria para professores da escola secundária. In: LINDQUIST, M. M. e SHULTE A. P. (orgs.). Aprendendo e Ensinando Geometria. Tradução: Hygino H. Domingues. São Paulo: Atual.

FONSECA, M. C. F. R. et al. (2002). O Ensino de Geometria na Escola Fundamental: três questões para a formação do professor dos ciclos iniciais. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.

MINAS GERAIS. (1997). Secretaria de Estado de Educação. Guia Curricular de Matemática. Belo Horizonte: SEE/MG.

PAVANELLO, R. M. (1989). O abandono do ensino de geometria no Brasil: uma visão histórica. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Estadual de Campinas.

How to Cite

Saramago de Oliveira, G., Malusá, S., Cordeiro, E. M., & Coutinho de Souza Silva, T. (2015). Pedagogical practice of geometry in youth and adult education: teaching and learning. Iberoamerican Journal of Education, 68(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie681172

Published

2015-05-15

Issue

Section

Artículos del especial

Most read articles by the same author(s)