La importancia de los procesos de regulación compartida en CSCL; rasgos teóricos y empíricos para su estudio
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35362/rie70171Palavras-chave:
computer-supported collaborative learning, social regulation of learning, shared regulation, shared knowledge construction.Resumo
La literatura reciente en el ámbito del aprendizaje colaborativo mediado por ordenador (Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning –CSCL–) destaca que un proceso colaborativo eficaz se asocia con la capacidad que tienen los alumnos para regular sus propias actividades. La noción de regulación compartida extiende su concepción del aprendizaje más allá de los procesos cognitivos y sus resultados; regular implica gestionar distintos componentes vinculados con la actividad y el funcionamiento del grupo (procesos vinculados con la estructura de la tarea, con la participación, y con componentes motivacionales). En este artículo se propone un conjunto de rasgos teóricos y empíricos que caracterizan a la regulación compartida como un ámbito de estudio emergente en el campo del CSCL. Dicha propuesta surge de la revisión de la literatura, en donde destacamos la diversidad de marcos teóricos y términos asociados con la regulación del aprendizaje, distinguimos distintos tipos de regulación social en el aprendizaje colaborativo, y distinguimos, desde el marco más amplio del proceso de aprendizaje colaborativo, entre regulación compartida y construcción compartida del conocimiento.
Downloads
Referências
Álvarez, R. B., & Mayo, I. C. (2009). Las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en la educación superior. Estudio descriptivo y de revisión. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 50 (7), 1-12.
Chan, C. K. K. (2012). Co-regulation of learning in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 7 (1), 63-73.
Dennen, V. P., & Wieland, K. (2007). From interaction to intersubjectivity: Facilitating online group discourse processes. Distance Education, 28 (3), 281-297.
Díaz, V. M. (2009). Las redes sociales y la universidad. El caso de DIPRO 2.0. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 66 (2), 1-11.
Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20 (4), 391-409.
Engel, A., & Onrubia, J. (2013). Estrategias discursivas para la construcción colaborativa del conocimiento en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Cultura y Educación, 25 (1), 77-94.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. En L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 (10), 906-911.
Flavell, J. (1987). Speculation about the motive and development of metacognition. En F. Weinert., & R. Klowe (Ed.). Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21-29). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15 (1), 7-23.
Grau, V., & Whitebread, D. (2012). Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction, 22 (6), 401-412.
Gress, C. L. Z., & Hadwin, A. F. (2010). Advancing educational research on collaboration through the use of gStudy computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) tools: Introduction to special issue. Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (5), 785-786.
Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113 (2), 240-264.
Hadwin, A. F., Wozney, L., & Pontin, O. (2005). Scaffolding the appropriation of self-regulatory activity: A socio-cultural analysis of changes in teacher-student discourse about a graduate research portfolio. Instructional Science, 33 (5), 413-450.
Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21 (3), 379-393.
Janssen, J., Erkens G., Kirschner P., & Kanselaar, G. (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7 (1), 25-43.
Jarvela, S., & Hadwin, A. H. (2013). New Frontiers: Regulating Learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48 (1), 25-39.
Jarvela, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., Koivuniemi, M., & Järvenoja, H. (2014). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63 (1), 125-142.
Jarvenoja, H., Volet, S., & Jarvela, S., (2012). Regulation of emotions in socially challenging learning situations: An instrument to measure the adaptive and social nature of the regulation process. Educational Psychology, 33 (1), 1-28.
Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2013). Toward a framework for CSCL research. Educational Psychologist, 48 (1), 1–8.
Lajoie, S., & Lu, J. (2012). Supporting collaboration with technology: Does shared cognition lead to co-regulation in medicine?. Metacognition and Learning, 7 (1), 45-62.
McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44 (2), 137-146.
Perner, J. (1991). Comprender la mente representacional. Barcelona: Paidós
Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulation learning. En M. Boakerts., P. Pintrich., & M. Zeidner (Ed.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego: Academic press.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33–40.
Reimann, P. (2009). Time is precious: Variable- and event-centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4 (3), 239-257.
Riviére, A. (1991). Objetos con mente. Madrid: Alianza.
Rogat, T. K., & Adams-Wiggins, K. R. (2015). Interrelation between regulatory and socioemotional processes within collaborative groups characterized by facilitative and directive other-regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 52 (1), 589-600
Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink, G. L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29 (4), 375-415.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. En C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-197). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Saab, N. (2012). Team regulation, regulation of social activities or co-regulation: Different labels for effective regulation of learning in CSCL. Metacognition and Learning, 7 (1), 1-6.
Saab, N., Joolingen, W., & Hout-Wolters, B. (2012). Support of the collaborative inquiry learning process: Influence of support on task and team regulation. Metacognition and Learning, 7 (1), 7-23.
Schoor, C., & Bannert, M. (2012). Exploring regulatory processes during a computer-supported collaborative learning task using process mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (4), 1321-1331.
Schoor, C., Narciss, S., & Korndle, H. (2015). Regulation During Cooperative and Collaborative Learning: A Theory-Based Review of Terms and Concepts. Educational Psychologist, 50 (2), 97-119.
Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained?. Learning and Instruction, 19 (2), 128-143.
Wellman, H. M. (1985). The Origins of Metacognition. En D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Ed.) Metacognition, Cognition and Human Performance (pp. 1-31). New York: Academic Press.
Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. En M. Boeakaerts., P. Pintrich., & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). San Diego: Academic press.
Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. En M. Boeakaerts., P. Pintrich., & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego: Academic press.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing studant use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23 (4), 614-628.
Zhang, J., Hong, H., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20 (2), 262-307.
Como Citar
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os(as) autores(as) que publiquem nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
